CORROBORATED
CF-GEI-20040501624 CORROBORATED
The Saint-Marsal ISS Misidentification
CASE FILE — CF-GEI-20040501624 — CASEFILES CLASSIFIED ARCHIVE
Date Date when the incident was reported or occurred
2004-05-14
Location Reported location of the sighting or event
Saint-Marsal, Pyrénées-Orientales, France
Duration Estimated duration of the observed phenomenon
Several minutes per pass
Object Type Classification of the observed object based on witness descriptions
light
Source Origin database or archive this case was sourced from
geipan
Witnesses Number of known witnesses who reported the event
1
Country Country where the incident took place
FR
AI Confidence AI-generated credibility score based on source reliability, detail consistency, and corroboration
85%
On May 14, 2004, at 21:44, an amateur astronomer in Saint-Marsal, Pyrénées-Orientales, observed a very bright point of light moving slowly across the sky from southwest to northeast over the course of several minutes. At 23:30 the same evening, the witness observed a second pass of the luminous object on a different trajectory, but again heading northeast. Despite his astronomical background, the witness was intrigued and could not explain the phenomenon, believing satellites should not be visible at that time of observation.
The case was initially reported to the gendarmerie, but no additional witnesses came forward. Originally designated as CERET (60), it was initially classified as 'C' (unidentified) by SEPRA, GEIPAN's predecessor organization. The case remained in this classification for years until modern re-examination became possible.
Using contemporary software tools and investigative experience accumulated over subsequent years, GEIPAN conducted a thorough re-examination of the case. The analysis revealed that the phenomenon's characteristics—duration, shape, size, color, and movement pattern—matched perfectly with the International Space Station (ISS). Orbital tracking confirmed the ISS was indeed present on the indicated trajectory at both times provided by the witness. The case was reclassified to 'A' (fully explained) as a clear observation of ISS passes, representing a textbook example of misidentification due to incorrect assumptions about satellite visibility.
02 Timeline of Events
21:44
First ISS Pass Observed
Amateur astronomer observes a very bright point of light moving slowly across the sky from southwest to northeast over several minutes
23:30
Second ISS Pass Observed
Witness observes second pass of luminous object on different trajectory, still heading northeast
2004-05-15
Report to Gendarmerie
Witness reports observation to local gendarmerie; no additional witnesses identified
2004
Initial SEPRA Classification
Case originally designated CERET (60) and classified as 'C' (unidentified) by SEPRA
2010s
GEIPAN Re-examination
Using modern software tools and accumulated investigative experience, GEIPAN conducts thorough re-examination of the case
Recent
Case Reclassified to 'A'
ISS orbital data confirms presence on indicated trajectories at witness-reported times. Case reclassified as fully explained (Classification A)
03 Key Witnesses
Anonymous Witness
Amateur astronomer
high
Amateur astronomer with sufficient knowledge to observe and track celestial objects, though held misconception about satellite visibility timing
"The witness was intrigued by this phenomenon that he could not explain, believing that satellites could not be visible at the moment of his observation"
04 Analyst Notes -- AI Processed
This case is particularly instructive because the witness was an amateur astronomer—someone with above-average knowledge of celestial phenomena—yet still misidentified a common astronomical object. The credibility factor is high in terms of observation accuracy (the witness correctly noted times, directions, and characteristics), but the interpretation was flawed due to a misconception that satellites or the ISS would not be visible at those times. This demonstrates that even experienced observers can be led astray by incorrect assumptions.
The evolution of this case classification is also noteworthy. Initially classified as 'C' (unidentified) by SEPRA, it took years and improved investigative tools before GEIPAN could definitively resolve it. The two separate passes at different times (21:44 and 23:30) on different trajectories both heading northeast are entirely consistent with ISS orbital mechanics. The witness's detailed observation actually made the case easier to resolve upon re-examination, as precise timing and trajectory data allowed for accurate orbital verification. This case exemplifies GEIPAN's commitment to ongoing case review and demonstrates how technological advances in satellite tracking software have improved investigative capabilities.
05 Theory Comparison
BELIEVER ANALYSIS
SKEPTIC ANALYSIS
Observer Misidentification Due to Faulty Assumptions
The witness, despite being an amateur astronomer, operated under the incorrect assumption that satellites or the ISS would not be visible at the observation times. This preconception prevented proper identification of a well-known astronomical object. The case demonstrates that expertise in one area doesn't prevent errors based on faulty assumptions. The detailed and accurate observation actually aided in later identification.
06 Verdict
ANALYST VERDICT
This case is conclusively explained as observation of the International Space Station. The witness's detailed reporting of times (21:44 and 23:30) and trajectories (southwest to northeast) allowed GEIPAN investigators to confirm ISS orbital passes matching exactly with the observations. The irony here is that the witness's astronomical knowledge did not prevent the misidentification—in fact, his incorrect assumption that satellites wouldn't be visible at those times created the mystery. The GEIPAN Classification 'A' is entirely justified, and this case serves as an educational example of how even knowledgeable observers can misinterpret familiar phenomena. The significance lies not in the mystery but in demonstrating the importance of checking assumptions and the value of orbital tracking tools in resolving UFO reports.
AI CONFIDENCE SCORE:
85%
07 Community Discussion
VIEW ALL >// NO COMMENTS YET
Be the first field agent to contribute analysis on this case.
08 Live Chat 1 ROOM
ENTER LIVE CHAT
Real-time discussion with other field agents analyzing this case.