UNRESOLVED
CF-GEI-19921101275 UNRESOLVED
The Martinique Green Light - Lamentin Airport Vicinity
CASE FILE — CF-GEI-19921101275 — CASEFILES CLASSIFIED ARCHIVE
Date Date when the incident was reported or occurred
1992-11-21
Location Reported location of the sighting or event
Le Lamentin, Martinique, France
Duration Estimated duration of the observed phenomenon
Several seconds
Object Type Classification of the observed object based on witness descriptions
light
Source Origin database or archive this case was sourced from
geipan
Witnesses Number of known witnesses who reported the event
2
Country Country where the incident took place
FR
AI Confidence AI-generated credibility score based on source reliability, detail consistency, and corroboration
85%
On November 21, 1992, at approximately 18:30 local time, a witness driving in Le Lamentin, Martinique observed a rapidly moving green light in the sky. The sighting occurred in close proximity to Martinique Aimé Césaire International Airport (formerly Lamentin Airport), yet the witness was adamant that the phenomenon could not be conventional aircraft. The witness was accompanied by their spouse at the time of the observation, though GEIPAN investigators only recorded testimony from one individual.
The case is notable primarily for its location near an active airport and the witness's explicit rejection of the aircraft explanation despite this proximity. The green coloration and high velocity were the defining characteristics of the observed phenomenon. The observation duration appears to have been brief, consistent with a rapidly moving object.
GEIPAN classified this case as 'C' (unidentified after investigation), indicating that while the phenomenon was reported and investigated, insufficient data prevented conclusive identification. The investigation was hampered by limited witness cooperation—only one of the two present individuals provided testimony—and no additional corroborating reports or physical evidence were obtained.
02 Timeline of Events
18:30
Initial Observation
Witness observing from vehicle in Le Lamentin area spots a green light in the sky moving at very high velocity
18:30 + seconds
Witness Assessment
Despite proximity to Martinique Aimé Césaire International Airport, witness determines the object cannot be conventional aircraft based on movement characteristics
18:30 + brief duration
Object Departs/Disappears
Green light disappears from view, likely due to rapid movement beyond visual range or descent below horizon
Post-incident
Limited Witness Cooperation
Only one of two witnesses present provides testimony to GEIPAN investigators; spouse declines or is not interviewed
Investigation Complete
GEIPAN Classification C Assigned
Case classified as unidentified due to insufficient information despite investigation efforts. No additional corroborating reports obtained.
03 Key Witnesses
Anonymous Witness 1
Civilian driver
medium
Driver who observed the phenomenon while traveling with spouse near Lamentin Airport. Only this individual provided official testimony to GEIPAN despite two people being present.
"Despite the nearby airport, I think it cannot be an aircraft."
Anonymous Witness 2
Civilian passenger
unknown
Spouse of primary witness, present during the sighting but did not provide testimony to investigators.
04 Analyst Notes -- AI Processed
This case presents several analytical challenges. The proximity to an international airport immediately raises questions about conventional aircraft, yet the witness explicitly discounted this possibility. Green lights or fireballs are commonly associated with several phenomena: meteor entry (particularly copper-rich meteorites), aircraft anti-collision lights, flares, or even ball lightning. The rapid movement described is consistent with a meteor, which would explain both the green color (indicative of magnesium or copper combustion) and the brief duration.
The credibility assessment is complicated by the lack of detail and the fact that only one witness provided testimony despite two people being present. This could indicate either reluctance from the second witness or possible disagreement about what was observed. The classification 'C' by GEIPAN suggests the investigators found the report credible enough to warrant that designation rather than dismissing it as easily explained (Class A) or insufficient data (Class D). However, the extremely sparse documentation and absence of corroborating evidence significantly limits analytical confidence. The case lacks critical details such as the object's trajectory, angular size, exact duration, altitude estimate, or whether any sound was associated with the sighting.
05 Theory Comparison
BELIEVER ANALYSIS
Unconventional Aerial Vehicle
The witness's explicit rejection of the aircraft explanation despite airport familiarity, combined with the unusual green coloration and exceptional velocity, could indicate an unconventional craft. However, this interpretation is highly speculative given the minimal data and lack of additional anomalous characteristics.
SKEPTIC ANALYSIS
Meteor/Bolide Entry
A bright meteor entering Earth's atmosphere would perfectly explain the green coloration (characteristic of magnesium, copper, or nickel combustion), extremely rapid movement, and brief duration. The 18:30 observation time (early evening, likely approaching dusk in late November) would make a bright meteor highly visible. Green fireballs are well-documented astronomical phenomena.
Aircraft with Unusual Lighting
Despite the witness's rejection of this explanation, the proximity to an international airport makes aircraft the primary conventional candidate. Green navigation lights, flares, or unusual approach angles could create an unfamiliar appearance. Military aircraft or emergency lighting could explain unconventional coloration.
06 Verdict
ANALYST VERDICT
The most probable explanation for this sighting is a bright meteor (bolide) entering Earth's atmosphere. The green coloration is a classic indicator of meteor composition, and the rapid movement across the sky is entirely consistent with this phenomenon. The witness's proximity to the airport may have actually made them more familiar with aircraft patterns, lending some credibility to their assertion that this was not conventional air traffic. However, the extreme paucity of detail, single-witness testimony despite two observers being present, and complete absence of corroborating reports significantly diminish the case's investigative value. This remains an unresolved case primarily due to insufficient data rather than compelling anomalous evidence. Confidence level: Medium-low that this was a natural astronomical phenomenon, specifically a green fireball meteor.
AI CONFIDENCE SCORE:
85%
07 Community Discussion
VIEW ALL >// NO COMMENTS YET
Be the first field agent to contribute analysis on this case.
08 Live Chat 1 ROOM
ENTER LIVE CHAT
Real-time discussion with other field agents analyzing this case.