CORROBORATED
CF-GEI-19940701363 CORROBORATED
The Jard-sur-Mer Garden Impact Craters
CASE FILE — CF-GEI-19940701363 — CASEFILES CLASSIFIED ARCHIVE
Date Date when the incident was reported or occurred
1994-07-31
Location Reported location of the sighting or event
Jard-sur-Mer, Vendée, France
Duration Estimated duration of the observed phenomenon
Impact event (discovery morning of July 31)
Object Type Classification of the observed object based on witness descriptions
other
Source Origin database or archive this case was sourced from
geipan
Witnesses Number of known witnesses who reported the event
1
Country Country where the incident took place
FR
AI Confidence AI-generated credibility score based on source reliability, detail consistency, and corroboration
85%
On the morning of July 31, 1994, a resident of Jard-sur-Mer in the Vendée department discovered unusual physical evidence in their garden. The witness observed small craters concentrated in four distinct points across the property. The craters contained rocky fragments and were surrounded by scorched grass, indicating high-temperature impact events had occurred, likely overnight or in the early morning hours before discovery.
The physical evidence consisted of multiple small impact sites, each containing stony material fragments. The burn patterns around the crater edges suggested the objects had been traveling at significant velocity and generated considerable heat upon impact. The concentration of impacts in four separate areas of the garden indicated either a fragmented meteoroid that broke apart during atmospheric entry, or multiple small meteorites from the same parent body.
GEIPAN investigators examined the site and collected the stony fragments for analysis. The case received a Classification A rating from GEIPAN, their highest confidence level, indicating the phenomenon was positively identified with certainty. Official conclusion determined this was a meteorite fall event, with the physical evidence matching known characteristics of small meteorite impacts in terrestrial environments.
02 Timeline of Events
Night of July 30-31, 1994
Meteorite Impact Event
Small meteoroid enters Earth's atmosphere over Vendée region, fragments during descent, and impacts in garden at Jard-sur-Mer creating multiple small craters
Morning, July 31, 1994
Discovery of Impact Sites
Property owner discovers small craters concentrated in four points across the garden, each containing rocky fragments and surrounded by scorched grass
July 31, 1994
Authorities Notified
Witness reports unusual ground traces to authorities, triggering GEIPAN investigation
Post-July 31, 1994
GEIPAN Field Investigation
Official investigators examine impact sites, document crater morphology, burn patterns, and collect stony fragments for laboratory analysis
Investigation Conclusion
Classification A - Meteorite Fall Confirmed
GEIPAN assigns Classification A (positively identified) after analysis confirms meteorite origin of the stony fragments and impact characteristics
03 Key Witnesses
Anonymous Witness 1
Civilian property owner
medium
Local resident of Jard-sur-Mer who discovered the impact evidence on their property
"Not available in source documentation"
04 Analyst Notes -- AI Processed
This case represents a straightforward meteorite fall with excellent physical evidence. The Classification A rating from GEIPAN indicates investigators were able to positively identify the phenomenon through analysis of the recovered materials and impact characteristics. The presence of stony fragments within the craters, combined with the burn patterns and impact morphology, provides strong physical corroboration of the meteorite hypothesis.
The clustering of impacts in four distinct points is consistent with atmospheric fragmentation of a single meteoroid, a common occurrence as these objects experience thermal stress and aerodynamic forces during high-velocity entry. The fact that the witness discovered the evidence rather than observing the actual fall suggests the event occurred during nighttime hours or early morning when no one was present to witness the luminous trail that typically accompanies meteorite falls. While this limits our understanding of the trajectory and entry characteristics, the physical evidence alone is sufficient for positive identification.
05 Theory Comparison
BELIEVER ANALYSIS
SKEPTIC ANALYSIS
Alternative Terrestrial Explanation
While GEIPAN's Classification A is highly reliable, alternative explanations could theoretically include industrial debris, fireworks residue, or other terrestrial projectiles. However, the stony composition of the fragments and the impact pattern characteristics strongly argue against these alternatives. Laboratory analysis of the collected materials would definitively rule out terrestrial sources through isotopic signatures and mineral composition typical of space-weathered materials.
06 Verdict
ANALYST VERDICT
This case is conclusively explained as a meteorite fall. The physical evidence—impact craters, stony fragments, and burn patterns—matches the characteristic signature of small meteorite impacts. GEIPAN's Classification A rating indicates high confidence in this identification, likely supported by material analysis confirming extraterrestrial origin. The case holds limited significance for UAP research but represents a well-documented example of how natural space debris can create unusual ground traces. The witness credibility is not a factor here, as the physical evidence speaks for itself. This serves as a useful reference case for distinguishing meteorite falls from unexplained phenomena.
AI CONFIDENCE SCORE:
85%
07 Community Discussion
VIEW ALL >// NO COMMENTS YET
Be the first field agent to contribute analysis on this case.
08 Live Chat 1 ROOM
ENTER LIVE CHAT
Real-time discussion with other field agents analyzing this case.