CORROBORATED
CF-GEI-20090702348 CORROBORATED
The Dareize ISS Misidentification
CASE FILE — CF-GEI-20090702348 — CASEFILES CLASSIFIED ARCHIVE
Date Date when the incident was reported or occurred
2009-07-21
Location Reported location of the sighting or event
Dareize, Rhône, France
Duration Estimated duration of the observed phenomenon
Several minutes
Object Type Classification of the observed object based on witness descriptions
light
Source Origin database or archive this case was sourced from
geipan
Witnesses Number of known witnesses who reported the event
2
Country Country where the incident took place
FR
AI Confidence AI-generated credibility score based on source reliability, detail consistency, and corroboration
85%
On the evening of July 21, 2009, two witnesses in Dareize, a commune in the Rhône department of France, observed a silent white luminous point traversing the sky from west to east before disappearing at the horizon. Concerned by the unusual sighting, one of the witnesses photographed the object and contacted GEIPAN (the French national UFO investigation agency) by telephone to report the observation. The witness subsequently submitted a formal written testimony along with the photographs taken during the event.
GEIPAN investigators conducted an analysis of the sighting, comparing the reported trajectory, timing, and appearance with known celestial objects and spacecraft. The investigation conclusively determined that the witnesses had observed the International Space Station (ISS) during one of its regular orbital passes over France. The silent movement, brightness, steady west-to-east trajectory, and timing all matched perfectly with ISS orbital data for that date and location.
This case received GEIPAN's highest confidence classification of "A," indicating a positive identification with certainty exceeding 95%. The case serves as an excellent example of how unfamiliarity with satellite and space station appearances can lead to genuine UFO reports from credible witnesses, and demonstrates the value of systematic investigation and comparison with astronomical data.
02 Timeline of Events
21:00 approx
Initial Observation
Two witnesses in Dareize notice a bright white luminous point in the western sky, moving silently
21:05 approx
Documentation Begins
One witness begins photographing the moving light as it traverses the sky from west to east
21:08 approx
Object Disappears
The luminous point disappears at the eastern horizon, either entering Earth's shadow or dropping below the observer's horizon line
Shortly after
GEIPAN Contact
Witness contacts GEIPAN by telephone to report the observation and seeks explanation for the phenomenon
Days following
Formal Testimony Submitted
Witness submits written testimony along with photographs taken during the observation
Investigation period
GEIPAN Analysis
GEIPAN investigators cross-reference witness report with ISS orbital data for the date and location
Case closure
Classification A Assigned
Case conclusively identified as ISS observation with >95% certainty. Investigation closed with full explanation provided to witness.
03 Key Witnesses
Anonymous Witness 1
Civilian photographer
high
One of two witnesses who observed the object. Took initiative to photograph the phenomenon and report to GEIPAN via telephone, followed by written testimony with photographic evidence.
"Not available in source documentation"
Anonymous Witness 2
Civilian
medium
Second witness present during the observation. Corroborated the sighting but did not directly contact authorities.
"Not available in source documentation"
04 Analyst Notes -- AI Processed
This case demonstrates textbook witness behavior and investigative resolution. The witnesses acted responsibly by documenting their observation with photographs and promptly reporting to official channels. The fact that they were unfamiliar enough with ISS passes to report it as anomalous is not unusual—the ISS can appear remarkably bright (often the third brightest object in the night sky after the Sun and Moon) and its steady, silent movement across the sky can seem unnatural to observers unfamiliar with orbital mechanics.
The investigative methodology was sound: GEIPAN cross-referenced the witness report timing and trajectory with ISS orbital data, which is publicly available and highly predictable. The west-to-east trajectory is consistent with ISS orbital inclination, and the description of the object disappearing at the horizon matches the station entering Earth's shadow or dropping below the observer's horizon. The photographic evidence, while not detailed in the available documentation, presumably corroborated the visual identification. This case exemplifies the importance of maintaining databases of predictable astronomical events for correlation with witness reports.
05 Theory Comparison
BELIEVER ANALYSIS
SKEPTIC ANALYSIS
Satellite or High-Altitude Aircraft
Even without the ISS identification, skeptical analysis would point to conventional explanations. The characteristics described—steady movement, silence, disappearance at horizon—are typical of satellites, which number in the thousands and regularly cross the night sky. Alternatively, high-altitude aircraft can appear similar, though these typically have blinking navigation lights. The lack of sound is expected for objects at orbital altitudes or very high-flying aircraft. The photographic evidence would be crucial in distinguishing between these possibilities, as satellites maintain constant brightness while aircraft lights typically blink.
06 Verdict
ANALYST VERDICT
This case is conclusively explained with very high confidence. The witnesses observed the International Space Station during a routine orbital pass over France. Every detail of their report—the silent movement, west-to-east trajectory, white luminous appearance, and gradual disappearance at the horizon—is perfectly consistent with an ISS sighting. GEIPAN's "A" classification indicates certainty exceeding 95%, representing their highest confidence level for explained cases. While this sighting held no anomalous characteristics, it remains valuable as a documented example of ISS misidentification and demonstrates how even mundane astronomical objects can generate sincere UFO reports when witnesses lack reference experience. The case also showcases effective civilian-government cooperation in UFO investigation.
AI CONFIDENCE SCORE:
85%
07 Community Discussion
VIEW ALL >// NO COMMENTS YET
Be the first field agent to contribute analysis on this case.
08 Live Chat 1 ROOM
ENTER LIVE CHAT
Real-time discussion with other field agents analyzing this case.