CORROBORATED
CF-GEI-20070102005 CORROBORATED
La Croix-Valmer Black Sun Artifact
CASE FILE — CF-GEI-20070102005 — CASEFILES CLASSIFIED ARCHIVE
Date Date when the incident was reported or occurred
2007-01-21
Location Reported location of the sighting or event
La Croix-Valmer, Var, France
Duration Estimated duration of the observed phenomenon
N/A - photographic artifact only
Object Type Classification of the observed object based on witness descriptions
other
Source Origin database or archive this case was sourced from
geipan
Witnesses Number of known witnesses who reported the event
1
Country Country where the incident took place
FR
AI Confidence AI-generated credibility score based on source reliability, detail consistency, and corroboration
85%
On January 21, 2007, during an early afternoon walk in La Croix-Valmer (Var department, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region), a witness took several photographs of the scenery. The witness reported seeing nothing unusual during the actual photography session. However, upon developing the photographs, the witness discovered mysterious black points appearing at the center of the sun in multiple images. Concerned by this anomaly, and prompted by a television program about UFO phenomena in 2008, the witness submitted the photographs and a questionnaire to GEIPAN for investigation.
GEIPAN's analysis revealed this to be a classic example of a phenomenon where anomalies appear only in photographic or video evidence and are never observed directly by the witness in real-time. The investigative report specifically identified this as a 'black sun' (soleil noir) phenomenon, a well-documented camera artifact. This occurs when a camera or photo device is aimed at scenes containing highly concentrated light sources such as the solar disk. Particularly visible in photographs numbered 78 and 82 from the witness's submission, the phenomenon demonstrates how certain image sensors—especially CMOS technology sensors—render ultra-bright zones as BLACK rather than the expected white saturation.
GEIPAN noted that they generally no longer process these types of post-observation photographic anomalies, as experience has shown that with sufficient investigation, explanations can be found in various camera artifacts. These have become increasingly frequent due to the widespread use of smartphones. However, this case was processed and published for educational purposes. The agency provided a reference to an IPACO (Image Pattern Analysis for Camera Optics) expert report that gives a precise technical description of the phenomenon. GEIPAN classified this case as 'A'—their highest certainty classification indicating a fully explained phenomenon with identified cause: photographic artifact.
02 Timeline of Events
2007-01-21 early afternoon
Photographs Taken
Witness takes several photographs during an afternoon walk in La Croix-Valmer. No unusual observations made during photography session.
2007-01-21 later
Anomaly Discovered
Upon developing photographs, witness notices black points appearing repeatedly at the center of the sun in multiple images, particularly visible in photos 78 and 82.
2008
Report Submitted
Following a television program about UFO phenomena, witness submits questionnaire and photographs to GEIPAN for analysis.
2008
Technical Analysis Completed
GEIPAN analyzes photographs and identifies 'black sun' phenomenon caused by CMOS sensor saturation when exposed to extreme light source.
2008
IPACO Expert Report
IPACO provides detailed technical description of the photographic phenomenon, confirming camera artifact explanation.
Final
Case Classified as 'A'
GEIPAN classifies case as Category A: fully explained photographic artifact. Case published for educational purposes.
03 Key Witnesses
Anonymous Witness
civilian photographer
high
Witness taking photographs during an afternoon walk in La Croix-Valmer. Demonstrated credibility by honestly reporting they saw nothing unusual during actual photography—anomaly appeared only in developed photos.
"Le témoin n'a rien vu d'anormal lors de la prise de vue. [The witness saw nothing abnormal during the photography.]"
04 Analyst Notes -- AI Processed
This case serves as an excellent example of the importance of distinguishing between direct observation and photographic evidence in UAP/UFO investigations. The witness's credibility is actually enhanced by their honest admission that nothing unusual was observed during the actual photography session—the anomaly appeared only upon review of the developed images. This detail is crucial for proper classification.
The technical explanation is robust and well-documented. The 'black sun' phenomenon is a known issue with CMOS sensors where extreme overexposure causes pixel saturation to register as black rather than white due to sensor overflow characteristics. GEIPAN's reference to the IPACO technical analysis provides scientific backing for this conclusion. The fact that the anomaly appeared consistently in the center of the sun across multiple photographs (particularly images 78 and 82) supports the sensor saturation explanation rather than suggesting an actual physical object. The one-year delay between the incident (January 2007) and the report (2008, following a TV program) is typical for cases where witnesses are uncertain whether their observation warrants investigation.
05 Theory Comparison
BELIEVER ANALYSIS
SKEPTIC ANALYSIS
Lens Flare or Optical Defect
Alternative technical explanation could involve lens flare, internal reflections, or optical defects in the camera system when pointed at bright light sources. However, the consistent positioning at the sun's center and CMOS sensor characteristics make the sensor saturation explanation more likely.
06 Verdict
ANALYST VERDICT
This case is definitively explained as a photographic artifact caused by CMOS sensor behavior when exposed to extreme light sources. The classification as GEIPAN Category 'A' (fully explained with identified cause) is entirely appropriate. While the witness's concern was understandable—mysterious black objects appearing in photographs can be alarming—the technical analysis leaves no doubt about the mundane origin of the phenomenon. This case holds no significance for UAP research but serves valuable educational purpose in demonstrating how camera artifacts can create false anomalies. The case exemplifies why GEIPAN now typically declines to investigate photographic-only anomalies that were not observed in real-time, as they nearly always resolve to technical explanations related to camera function. Confidence level in this explanation: 100%.
AI CONFIDENCE SCORE:
85%
07 Community Discussion
VIEW ALL >// NO COMMENTS YET
Be the first field agent to contribute analysis on this case.
08 Live Chat 1 ROOM
ENTER LIVE CHAT
Real-time discussion with other field agents analyzing this case.